Sunday, 1 March 2009

Child porno and traffic summon no difference

Hello Mr. Anti Corruption (Ahmad Said), stop saying that most men have such contents in their phone. I would like to see if your handphone has such contents since you so brave to place a bet.
Nevertheless, no matter how you do not want to associate with your son in this case, he is still your son, have you heard to the saying,"Like father like son?". The case was very simple and clear to the Australian authorities, but what I do not understand is how confused you are about a plain right or wrong? What is so misleading to you?
Therefore, I just wonder how you conduct investigations on those corrupted people (until proven guilty, of course), can you differentiate between left and right or guilty and innocent? Obviously, you cannot differentiate between child porno and a traffic summon.

1 March 2009 PUTRAJAYA: As chief commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan is fully aware that all his actions and that of his family members as well will always come under public scrutiny.

Ahmad Said has been attacked in blogs and via e-mail over the issue of his son bringing child pornographic material into Aus-tralia. His son, a pilot, pleaded guilty and paid a fine for the offence.

Ahmad Said vehemently denies that it was child pornography. He said that the titles of the video clips found in his son’s laptop computer were misleading.
“I can bet with you that it’s something that you will find on most men’s handphones,” he said. “Why are they targeting me? I did nothing over there. It’s like committing a traffic offence here and paying the summons – and then the father gets blamed for it. Is that fair? It’s brainless,” he said.

No comments:

Post a Comment